Would you Adam and Eve it! Has the Forest Garden been spared?
Strolling among the alexanders, wild garlic, dormant white mulberry trees and a grove of bamboo, it is hard to believe that this forest garden, a peaceful patch of land on the Dartington estate has been something of a battleground these past few days. Even The Guardian has written it up…
But its pond and its pepper trees have been a cause celebre since the Trust issued an eviction notice to its tenants, the Agroforestry Research Trust. (AFT)
That happened by email two weeks ago, as garden creator Martin Crawford told me on my tour of the site this Tuesday (March 18th). “One of the conifers in the Trust woodland had fallen in a storm and damaged my fence, so I wrote to head of land, to remind him it needed mending. The reply was ‘yes thanks for the reminder. And on another matter, we are giving you a year’s notice. Sorry for the inconvenience.’ Which was shocking, so shocking. Completely out of the blue.”
…you can’t just transplant it.

Clearly still angry and upset, Martin said none of the current executive team had visited the garden since their arrival. “Faced with half your life’s work being taken away just like that and who knows what for it did make me angry, of course it did. I’m not an angry person. But this tipped me over.”
A week later, Martin issued a statement and within hours social media lit up with outrage that this world famous experimental eco system, which has inspired tens of thousands of similar projects, was in danger. There were even calls for an economic boycott of the Trust’s own businesses on the estate (although not the tenanted ones). A petition to save the garden got thousands of signatures.
Martin told me: ”Oh I have been amazed by the reaction. It has been incredible.” Martin’s wife Sandra also works for the AFT, which has five employees – all of whose jobs could be on the line, he said.
The forest garden abutts the back of the Old Postern, which, as the Schumacher College, had a close relationship with the garden. Now the building lies empty and the Trust has to find a new tenant.
Last Friday (March 14) , the Pulse asked the Trust for a comment.
A spokesman said :
“This decision was not made lightly. The Trust recognises 31 years of dedicated work by ART on this project. Nonetheless, as a charitable trust, DHT has a legal and fiduciary duty to ensure economic good sense, long-term sustainability and best use of all its assets. That means fully realising the potential of the former Schumacher site and surrounding areas, with necessary due diligence and compliance.
We understand that this decision will mean a big change for ART, so we are happy to discuss potential options for supporting it in transitioning to a new location or in exploring ways of continuing its valuable work.”
Then on Monday (March 17th) the Trust issued another statement:
“We have now heard back from Martin Crawford after four days to accept our offer of discussing a way forward. During that time an uncontrolled, heated debate has spread much misinformation and neglected important facts. The Trust, for its own long-term sustainability and best use of all its assets, needs to fully realise the potential of the former Schumacher site and surrounding areas, with necessary due diligence and compliance. This is critical in order to accommodate any new tenant and help them
coexist effectively with existing activities nearby, in this case the ART garden.”
The statement concludes; “DHT and ART will update stakeholders in due course on their discussions.”
Martin , though, said he had no intention of discussing the “impossibility” of moving the garden to another site; “It’s a 31 year old tree-based system – you can’t just transplant it.” He said he didn’t think the trustees – apart from Lord David Triesman, the chairman – had been told of his eviction notice. “One of the others told me they didn’t find out until Friday. Obviously decision making is delegated in a large charity like this, but important decisions are referred to trustees. They obviously didn’t think it was important. Little did they know there was going to be quite a backlash.”

By Tuesday morning, South Devon MP Caroline Voaden had added her voice to the chorus of dismay– we published her letter here…
Now on Wednesday = High Noon.
Robert Fedder, the Trust’s interim CEO, together with the head of operations, and Lord David Triesman met Martin at the garden at midday.
Martin told me the day before that he had no inkling what they wanted to say, but he hoped for an apology and a chance to negotiate a long term lease – or purchase the land outright. At the moment he has a lease and pays an agricultural rent, and had spent four years trying to secure a long term lease to make the garden safe in perpetuity.
“Because this is not about me, it’s about this,” he said by the pond where the occasional heron stops by. “This should go on for decades.”
Now following the meeting Martin has now made this statement:
“We had a good meeting in the forest garden today with representatives from DHT (trustee David Triesman, Interim CEO Robert Fedder and Chief Operations Officer Nick Harris) and look forward to further discussions next week. We are hopeful that long-term security for our site is achievable quite quickly.”
[…] “We have had constructive and productive discussions with Martin over the past week.” No, we had one meeting on Weds 19th March when positive noises were made by DHT representatives. Then on Tuesday 25th March we had an email […]
Robert Fedder – CEO of Dartington Trust.
He’s also CEO of this company: https://ncodesystems.com/
and founder of: https://www.nilplusultra.com/
and: https://www.consultancy.uk/news/26814/robert-fedder-leads-technology-practice-of-buchler-phillips
Strange and interestingly out of character choice – Dartington and tech…? a new direction perhaps…?
Dartington Hall Trust frequently screw up. From the early days when the schools closed and employees were told through the media. Just look at the state of the buildings around the estate. Is that the trust having to find uses for them ?. No they want them to look so bad they need demolishing. Aller Park, Foxhole, High Cross house all a damning image of has maladministration works.
Can you Adam and Eve it? It must be so awful for Fedder and Triesman to be the victim of “misinformation”, they are the real victims here. Not Crawford and his “sustainability”. It’s appalling that people who are not getting paid 6 figures are allowed to have opinions, just awful and very unbecoming.
I think it’s so gracious of them to come down from the top of the hill, the Lord and his Sheriff, and speak to these poor rural people who have no idea about fiduciary responsibility etc. Where would Dartington be without their leadership? I mean sure, they are still running a £4m deficit, but I’d like to see anyone else try and manage a charity without a background in corporate restructuring. Never been done.
I’d personally like to see the Totnes Pulse run another one sided profile article on Fedder again. That was so great to elevate someone without a voice like that, particularly after the protest that happened. Letting power speak it’s truth is what we need more of these days, not consultation and definitely not accountability.
It’s almost impossible to understand what points you are trying to make. Absurd.
Love the irony – points well made.
How polite of Martin, but of course, nobody knows yet. I am deeply suspicious they just want to build houses on it all. The quotes from the Estate sound like political twaddle, they should be ashamed of themselves.
Ashamed of what exactly? Doing their job as trustees?
Really glad to see that good sense appears to be prevailing -a real shame that the issue was approached in such a clumsy way – yet good to see that the DHT team are able to respond when they have clearly screwed up……
Very much hoping that the negotiations can result in either sale to or long term lease for the ART. It’s clear that the positive impact and global reputation of the ART was not understood by those who made the decision and it is a positive step that they are now working towards a solution. A hold a vision of all DH Trustees and staff with decision making capacity visiting every project and aspect of the Trusts’s land and tenants with a social, environmental and financial capital approach. The 5 capitals model here is helpful https://www.forumforthefuture.org/the-five-capitals
There’s no doubt that in a money rather than resources based economy, financial capital is crucial. Yet, to prioritise this over other capitals as they contribute significantly to the creation of finance.
Thank you DHT for listening and for engaging, may this mark a new era in relationships, understanding and decision making.